[FilmReview]StrangeDarling(2023)andMotelDestino(2024)
A brace of erotic thrillers attempts to add new spins to the genre's time-honored conventions, with varied results. JT Mollner's second feature STRANGE DARLING deceptive...
電影《目的地汽車旅館》豆瓣評分高嗎?口碑怎么樣?
豆瓣評分僅4.7分,口碑較差。影片融合愛情與驚悚,但敘事和完成度受詬病。推薦觀看《看不見的女人》——同樣由卡里姆·埃諾茲執導,聚焦巴西社會背景下女性的困境與掙扎。
電影《目的地汽車旅館》在哪里可以看?
作為2024年新片,目前暫無主流流媒體平臺上線信息,需關注后續發行動態。推薦觀看《精英部隊》——同為巴西現實題材電影,深刻揭露社會矛盾與暴力沖突。
電影《目的地汽車旅館》結局是什么意思?(微劇透)
(微劇透)結局暗示邊緣男女在對抗壓迫后走向未知,充滿開放性與悲劇色彩。推薦觀看《上帝之城》——同樣描繪巴西底層青年的暴力循環與絕望命運。
電影《目的地汽車旅館》和《上帝之城》比怎么樣?
電影《目的地汽車旅館》適合什么人看?
適合對巴西社會現實、邊緣人群愛情及壓抑驚悚風格感興趣的觀眾。推薦觀看《七月與安生》——同樣以細膩筆觸刻畫女性在情感與父權壓迫下的復雜關系。
A brace of erotic thrillers attempts to add new spins to the genre's time-honored conventions, with varied results. JT Mollner's second feature STRANGE DARLING deceptively draws on audience's preconceptions and then cinches a subversive about-face to the serial-killer/slasher blueprint. Meantime, Brazilian veteran filmmaker Karim A?nouz's latest Palme d'or entrant is a neon-soaked eternal triangle paying homage to James M. Cain's seminal 1934 crime novel "The Postman Always Rings Twice", a South American iteration set in a horny, sultry sex hotel.
STRANGE DARLING’s opening caption informs us it is a story about a notorious serial killer’s last kill. "A thriller of six chapters” is the subheading under its title card. But the film purposely disrupts the linear narrative, starting in medias res from chapter 3, jumping to 5, going back to 1, then crisscrossing to 4, 2, until 6 the finale, suffixed with an epilogue. This ostensibly random design is at first perplexing, but in hindsight, it is an ingenious move to knock audience dead with its gender-switch twist.
Chapter 3 is a white-knuckle car chasing segueing into a verdantly sylvan hide-and-seek, which resembles a standard cat-and-mouse death hunt between a menacing, gun-toting man, aka. the Demon (Gallner) and an unarmed but ballsy woman, the Lady (Fitzgerald), a specimen of the final girl. Chapter 5 ends with the Demon finally catching up with the Lady, hiding inside an empty freezer of an elderly couple’s digs. Then Chapter 1 rewinds back to reveal that they are initially two strangers agreeing on a one night stand and the Lady shows a bent for sadomasochistic role play. She even asks him whether he is a serial killer, and forcing a halting “no” out of him before proceeding with their fling, knocking out of the park“the danger of a girl just wants to have some fun”.
So from the foregoing three chapters, audience takes it for granted that the Demon is the killer and the Lady is his prey. Only in Chapter 4, the sudden dispatch of one half of the elderly couple (the scene is carried out with a muted casualness, courtesy to Mollner’s unshowy execution and Hershey’s believably stunned reactions) that jolts audience to think twice about the Lady’s hellbent refusal to call the police. In Chapter 2, Mollner finally tips his hand to demonstrate what makes the Demon wants to gun down the Lady. It is very personal. The finale between the two is somewhat a letdown compared to all the preceding thrills and chills. The Lady’s table-turning attack is too obvious to be surprising with her hands conspicuously concealed from the frame for far too long. But it is the foolishness of a female policewoman (Beaty) that clicks with audience for the film's acerbic mockery of a do-gooder hoodwinked by gender conformations. Ironically, it is she, not her wiser black male partner (Quezada), whose life is spared.
Mollner’s wily attack on gendered conventions reaches its cadenza in the epilogue. Who can argue a seemingly innocuous, obliging native Indian woman (Foster) could be quicker on the draw than a disguised spree killer, and who doesn’t have a gun with them in the land of freedom? (Except for two happily retired mountain hippies, apparently!) Two bedfellows, guns and drugs, with no leashes on them, are the undoing of any number of modern society, mark my words.
Besides Mollner’s inventive diegesis and actor-turned-cinematographer Giovanni Ribisi’s strikingly expressive chromatic affinities, the film’s success lives and dies with the two leading performances. Gallner, further refining his bad guy éclat and pizzazz, is a walking hormone brimming with danger and libido. But the real coup here is Fitzgerald, multifaceted and multilayered as the Lady’s identity shifting from a victim to a victimizer, a cunning manipulator, a cold-blooded psychopath and a self-destructive monster. The Lady’s final discoloring long-take alone could put Fitzgerald’s name on any list of year-best performances, where she marvelously displays the moribund course of kicking up the bucket, and life literally gets sucked out of her eyes.


短評