[FilmReview]Wanda(1970)andPartyGirl(1995)
A brace of female-directed debut features, both are about an aimless young woman trying to map out her “self-concept” in a disorienting built environment. Barbara Loden’s WANDA is...
電影《派對女郎》結局是什么?(微劇透)
(微劇透)派對女孩在圖書館工作中找到人生方向,完成自我轉變。推薦觀看《風月俏佳人》——同樣描繪女主角從浮華生活轉向追求真摯情感與個人成長的浪漫故事。
電影《派對女郎》評價怎么樣?
影片評價積極,被視為一部關于浪子回頭的輕松詼諧成長喜劇。推薦觀看《早餐俱樂部》——同為90年代青春片,深刻描繪邊緣青少年群體的內心與成長。
電影《派對女郎》適合什么人看?
適合喜歡90年代復古風格、輕松女性成長故事的觀眾。推薦觀看《女孩夢三十》——同樣以奇幻方式講述女性重新審視生活、找回初心的喜劇。
電影《派對女郎》和《獨領風騷》比如何?
電影《派對女郎》劇情講的是什么?
劇情講述一個不負責任的派對女孩被擔保后,在圖書館工作并逐漸改變人生的故事。推薦觀看《打工女郎》——同樣描繪職場女性憑借智慧與努力突破困境、實現價值的勵志喜劇。
電影《派對女郎》導演戴斯·馮·施勒·梅耶風格如何?
導演風格帶有獨立電影的詼諧與對亞文化群體的細膩觀察。推薦觀看《半熟少年》——同樣由他執導,真實殘酷地呈現90年代美國青少年迷茫的生活狀態。
A brace of female-directed debut features, both are about an aimless young woman trying to map out her “self-concept” in a disorienting built environment. Barbara Loden’s WANDA is a starkly downbeat portrait of its eponymous drifter’s dead-end existence, and remains as her sole feature-length film; 25 years later, Daisy von Scherler Mayer’s first feature PARTY GIRL stars indie-queen Parker Posey as its titular heroine, a NYC fashion plate and party hostess, who must come to terms with her new-found vocation as a librarian.
Although they can be homogenized for their thematic focus, both films’s backdrops and tones cannot be more disparate. WANDA is a grainy, guerrilla-style road film maundering in rural eastern Pennsylvania. Wanda (Loden) is a helpless doormat, none too intelligent, unmoored from life like a floating weed. She might just as well be the American cousin of the homeless Mona in Agnès Varda’s VAGABOND (1985), but devoid of the latter’s Gallic steeliness and blue-sky dignity. Wanda is fragile, mostly defenseless, she has very limited resources. Being dragooned into becoming an accomplice of a small-time bank robber Mr. Dennis (a spivvish Higgins lording it over with a memorable force of ferocity), who is both physically and emotionally abusive to her, it is not a Bonnie and Clyde affair, Wanda lucks out simply because of her ill-equipped sense of bearings, that is the irony of being chosen as a getaway driver.
Loden’s script dives down to the basest point, aka. through Wanda’s utter abjection, like the toxic bonding with Mr. Dennis, her incorrigible passivity and none-the-wiser resignation, in order to elicit audience’s maximal sympathy towards a naive, kind, innocuous but ultimately reactive woman who can be easily swallowed whole by the cruel world around her. And were the film to be directed by a male director, flaks of exploitation and gendered ulterior motives would be pelted down upon him, ergo WANDA’s success is pivoted on, firstly, its perspective originated from Loden’s own life, who is accorded the first-hand verisimilitude of Wanda’s plight and dilemma, and secondly, Loden’s central performance, tendering Wanda’s soul-baring vulnerability on a plate, and then letting it savagely ravaged by the life as we know it. Yet, Wanda is also unconventionally strong, she has no scruples of leaving her two kids to her ex-husband and isn’t guilt-tripped by her maternal obligation, for better or worse, she is pragmatic and a living litmus test of the sterner sex’s banal cruelty.
Nobody wants to watch a dashed American dream from a nonentity, to say nothing of it is about a dowdy, subservient member of the distaff side, so WANDA’s mere existence becomes a rare outlier in the USA independent cinema soil and its significance only surges in the process of time. The fact that Loden, a triple threat who shows her promising, directorial finesse with an affinity for John Cassavetes, but fails to score another feature-length project (she died in 1980 at age 48 from breast cancer before working on a new feature film) speaks volumes about the difficulties facing a female filmmaker at then, it also makes one wonder whether being Mrs. Elia Kazan has helped her or not, career-wise.



短評